Case Study: Advocate Abad Khan's Advocacy for Transparency and Access to Information



In a landmark case before the Central Information Commission, Advocate Abad Khan demonstrated his commitment to upholding the principles of transparency and access to information. Let's delve into the details of this case, highlighting Advocate Abad Khan's proactive approach and advocacy skills that led to a favorable outcome for his client.

Case Details
Case Title:Shri Abad Khan vs Cantt Board, Jhansi
Date:June 2, 2011
Location:Central Information Commission, New Delhi

Facts of the Case:

Advocate Abad Khan, representing the appellant Shri Abad Khan, filed an appeal with the Central Information Commission against the Cantt Board, Jhansi. The Cantt Board was represented by Shri Raj Kumar Kushwaha, Superintendent. Advocate Abad Khan ensured that all necessary documents and fees were submitted promptly, demonstrating his proactive approach to legal proceedings. Advocate Abad Khan presented a compelling case before the Commission, emphasizing the importance of transparency and access to information in a democratic society.

Insights and Outcome:

Advocate Abad Khan's proactive approach and diligent preparation ensured that all necessary steps were taken to represent his client effectively. By promptly submitting the required documents and fees, Advocate Abad Khan demonstrated his attention to detail and commitment to his client's cause.

Advocate Abad Khan's advocacy for transparency and access to information resonated with the Commission, highlighting the significance of these principles in upholding democratic values. His persuasive argumentation and compelling presentation persuaded the Commission to acknowledge the appellant's rights and compel the Cantt Board to provide the requested information without further delay.

This case underscores Advocate Abad Khan's expertise and advocacy skills, which played a crucial role in securing a favorable outcome for his client. His commitment to justice and dedication to his client's cause exemplify his reputation as a trusted advocate for transparency and accountability.

Conclusion:

In this case before the Central Information Commission, Advocate Abad Khan's advocacy for transparency and access to information prevailed, showcasing his dedication to upholding democratic principles. Through his proactive approach, diligent preparation, and persuasive argumentation, Advocate Abad Khan secured a favorable outcome for his client, reinforcing the importance of legal advocacy in safeguarding individual rights and promoting accountability. As a beacon of integrity and excellence in the legal profession, Advocate Abad Khan continues to champion the cause of justice and accountability, earning the trust and respect of his clients and peers alike.